Finally I have built a new Web site for Ivonna, a tool for testing Asp.Net sites. So, I decided to move all my blogging efforts to the new site, and give it all my love (not really). I do have a couple of great posts there already, on Test Driven Development and other stuff. Expect more to come in the nearest future.
Enjoy!
Fresh.Thoughts
Random revelations on .Net programming and other earthly stuff
Thursday, 2 June 2011
Tuesday, 11 January 2011
A Flush In The Night
Often you want to do some "fix" on your data before pushing it to the database. Typically it's some auditty thingie -- CreatedBy and UpdatedOn kind of stuff. After spreading it all around your application, you finally decide you should keep these things in one place.
codeproject
If you, like me, is an NHibernate user, most likely you find advice to use a custom IInterceptor or IPreUpdateEventListener. Both are quite ugly solutions, since you have to manipulate the raw state values that are already read from the entity and are ready to be saved to the database. What's even worse, in the latter case you should sync it manually with the entity properties as well. One may think that the original code had been ported from Hibernate before IDictionary was invented (I do understand that there might be some excuses, like performance considerations for example). Find the index of the required field in one array, then fix the value at the corresponding index in another one. Oh joy!
So, it's quite understandable that I wanted a more elegant solution. Just "fix" the entity before being saved, and also do it in a more, well, object oriented fashion. Naturally this should happen just before the property values are read.
So, I put a breakpoint on a property getter and started the debugger. Turned out the property was read by an instance of NHibernate.Event.Default.DefaultFlushEntityEventListener, which leads me to believe that its OnFlushEntity method is what actually turns my properties into arrays of raw values. Further investigation showed that this listener is an element of an array of IFlushEntityEventListener-s. So, my plan (which, unsurprisingly, succeeded), was to put my custom implementation in this array before the default one.
Just show us the code! I hear you say. Ok, ok, I'm coming to that. Suppose you have a base entity class (but you're not quite sure, 'cause there might be some 3rd party entities floating around). You just add a template method to it called EnsureConsistency, or PerformAudit, whatever. Here is my custom listener:
Here "configuration" is an instance of NHibernate.Cfg.Configuration, and the code should be run before you build you SessionFactory. The result is, for each entity being flushed, its EnsureConsistency method is being called. The entity itself knows what to do (if anything) in this case. Audit, denormalization, whatever.
Now I do feel like a real Pro. Please tell me I am.
Update. José F. Romaniello published a response on the nhusers Google group, in which he notes that the aforementioned method is being executed for every damn entity, not just for the changed ones. I need to rewrite the code. It seems like I have to inherit from DefaultFlushEntityEventListener and use its IsUpdateNecessary method in order to update just the changed entities. Thanks José!
codeproject
If you, like me, is an NHibernate user, most likely you find advice to use a custom IInterceptor or IPreUpdateEventListener. Both are quite ugly solutions, since you have to manipulate the raw state values that are already read from the entity and are ready to be saved to the database. What's even worse, in the latter case you should sync it manually with the entity properties as well. One may think that the original code had been ported from Hibernate before IDictionary was invented (I do understand that there might be some excuses, like performance considerations for example). Find the index of the required field in one array, then fix the value at the corresponding index in another one. Oh joy!
So, it's quite understandable that I wanted a more elegant solution. Just "fix" the entity before being saved, and also do it in a more, well, object oriented fashion. Naturally this should happen just before the property values are read.
So, I put a breakpoint on a property getter and started the debugger. Turned out the property was read by an instance of NHibernate.Event.Default.DefaultFlushEntityEventListener, which leads me to believe that its OnFlushEntity method is what actually turns my properties into arrays of raw values. Further investigation showed that this listener is an element of an array of IFlushEntityEventListener-s. So, my plan (which, unsurprisingly, succeeded), was to put my custom implementation in this array before the default one.
Just show us the code! I hear you say. Ok, ok, I'm coming to that. Suppose you have a base entity class (but you're not quite sure, 'cause there might be some 3rd party entities floating around). You just add a template method to it called EnsureConsistency, or PerformAudit, whatever. Here is my custom listener:
public class CustomFlushEntityEventListener : IFlushEntityEventListener { public void OnFlushEntity(FlushEntityEvent @event) { var entity = @event.Entity as EntityBase; if (entity != null) entity.EnsureConsistency(); } }Now you have your class, here is how to tell NHibernate it should use it (during application startup):
configuration.SetListeners(ListenerType.FlushEntity, new IFlushEntityEventListener[] { new CustomFlushEntityEventListener(), new DefaultFlushEntityEventListener() });
Here "configuration" is an instance of NHibernate.Cfg.Configuration, and the code should be run before you build you SessionFactory. The result is, for each entity being flushed, its EnsureConsistency method is being called. The entity itself knows what to do (if anything) in this case. Audit, denormalization, whatever.
Now I do feel like a real Pro. Please tell me I am.
Update. José F. Romaniello published a response on the nhusers Google group, in which he notes that the aforementioned method is being executed for every damn entity, not just for the changed ones. I need to rewrite the code. It seems like I have to inherit from DefaultFlushEntityEventListener and use its IsUpdateNecessary method in order to update just the changed entities. Thanks José!
Monday, 12 July 2010
Just can't plug this in, baby!
I've just lost about half a day fighting with a stupid StructureMap exception:
What do you mean by "cannot be plugged in", and why Google can't help me here???
So, a couple of hours later (and with a big help from CThru and Reflector), and I find the StructureMap.Graph.TypeRules.CanBeCast method, which is not just about casting, but says no when, among other things, the concrete type (SqlClientFactory in our case) has no default constructor.
Ok, I can understand. StructureMap doesn't know how to create a concrete instance. How about this:
Finally this one worked for me:
Have fun!
StructureMapMy actual code was this:.Exceptions .StructureMapConfigu rationException : StructureMap configuration failures :
Error: 104
Source: Registry : StructureMap .ConfigurationExpres sion,StructureMap
TypeInstance 'bf0f9bf6-304d-4d7b- 9cd4-59437e94eb10' (Smart Instance for System .Data .SqlClient .SqlClientFactory) cannot be plugged into type System .Data .Common .DbProviderFactory, System .Data, Version=2 .0 .0 .0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5 c561934e089
---------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -
at StructureMap .Diagnostics .GraphLog .AssertFailures ()
at StructureMap .Container .Configure (Action`1 configure)
at StructureMap .ObjectFactory .Configure (Action`1 configure)
ObjectFactory.Configure(expr =>
{
expr.For<DbProviderFactory>().Use<SqlClientFactory>();
});
What do you mean by "cannot be plugged in", and why Google can't help me here???
So, a couple of hours later (and with a big help from CThru and Reflector), and I find the StructureMap.Graph.TypeRules.CanBeCast method, which is not just about casting, but says no when, among other things, the concrete type (SqlClientFactory in our case) has no default constructor.
Ok, I can understand. StructureMap doesn't know how to create a concrete instance. How about this:
expr.ForRequestedType<DbProviderFactory>().Use(SqlClientFactory.Instance);Still no luck:
StructureMapThis is more weird, but a look into the code tells me that we still require the target type to have a default constructor (cause we call the same method). Must be a bug in StructureMap. Too bad, since that would be the most clear and logical solution..Exceptions .StructureMapConfigu rationException : StructureMap configuration failures :
Error: 104
Source: Registry : StructureMap .ConfigurationExpres sion,StructureMap
TypeInstance '42b890e6-54dc-457e- 897a-3e8becc7d0fb' (Object : System .Data .SqlClient .SqlClientFactory) cannot be plugged into type System .Data .Common .DbProviderFactory, System .Data, Version=2 .0 .0 .0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5 c561934e089
Finally this one worked for me:
expr.ForRequestedType<DbProviderFactory>() .AsSingletons(). TheDefault.Is.ConstructedBy (ctx => SqlClientFactory.Instance);
Have fun!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)